Thursday 10 September 2015

The Mask Is Off

                                                              The new normal



It used to take decades for us immigration bores to be vindicated. Much of what Enoch Powell warned of in his famous “Rivers of Blood” speech back in 1968 didn’t actually come to pass for a generation. These days though the dynamic seems to have accelerated somewhat.

Before Blair Muslim migrants weren’t much trouble, at least at first. They generally got jobs and got on with their lives. The main problem with them was their children who rediscovered Islam and started to get into our faces about it. The first time they came onto most people’s radar was the Satanic Verses episode back in 1989. Many of us sat dumbfounded watching the TV as mobs of deranged Muslims ran amok screaming “Death to Rushdie”. It was then that many of us began to realise that their culture was not only distinctly unpleasant, but more worrying still they seemed very attached to it.

After New Labour opened up the public spending spigot along with our borders the resulting influx of Islamic migrants very often went straight onto benefits. This explosion in idleness saw the numbers of young Muslim men on disability benefit reach the almost incredible figure of 24%. With more time on their hands their thoughts turned to Allah and so started the endless whining, spit flecked tirades and intimidation on the streets that has become the backdrop to all our lives ever since then. On the plus side though, our new Muslim citizens still generally waited for the ink to dry on their new passports before they made too much of a nuisance of themselves.

But after the ink did dry, the early years of this century also saw the terrible milestone of the appearance of no-go areas imposed by Mohammadans with ever increasing attacks on “the dirty kuffar”. For the first time in hundreds of years British citizens could not roam their own country at will. Once again though the most explosive problem, literally, was the kids. Ironically, many of the Muslims who became involved in terrorism at this time had entered the country as bedraggled refugee children fleeing oppression and war in the Muslim world.

Now following the "Arab Spring" we’ve clearly reached a new stage of Islamic immigration. Muslims no longer conceal their contempt for us.  Even before being awarded refugee status or passports they are rampaging through Europe. Some people are using the word “invasion” which I thought a bit melodramatic at first. But the incredible behaviour of these people we are assured by the media are helpless refugees (the riots, the arrogance, the attacks, the intimidation, the chants) confirms the truth of what is going on. Mostly consisting of young aggressive males; they don’t look like refugees and they sure don’t behave like refugees. This then really is a Muslim invasion of Europe. 



So, the mask is off. Muslim immigrants clearly no longer feel they need to pretend. And it’s also clear from their behaviour that they think we are scared of them. After all, why else would we allow them to riot, destroy our property, attack our citizens and abuse our police? And the longer we go on tolerating that violence and intimidation the worse the outrages will get, because there's nothing that sets the jihadi juices flowing more than our tolerance, i.e., weakness.  

 

But the invaders are misreading us. European governments and our media elite are not scared of them. In their gilded cocoons they rarely encounter the unpleasant daily reality of Muslim neighbours. For their part as good liberals they are simply trying to help the unfortunate brown people. The fact that the vast majority are also Muslim actually puts the invaders at the top of the liberal hierarchy of deserving victims. These caring lefties, of course, are also totally misreading the “refugees” behaviour. The result is a weird symbiosis between the two deluded groups. The worse the marauders behave, the more desperate liberals assume them to be and so the more they want to help them. And the more they help them the weaker the invaders think we are, and so they ramp up the intimidation even further, and so on. Our soon to be compatriots could be beheading border guards by the dozen and our leaders would only redouble their efforts to persuade the rest of us that such behaviour though regrettable is entirely understandable given the terrible circumstances of the refugees and is of course nothing at all to do with Islam, blah, blah, blah. 


As to how it will all end your guess is as good as mine. Three things though seem very clear.

Islam is a supremacist ideology. As such our the endless efforts to reach out, to assist, and to tolerate them are all seen merely as a weakness too tempting to resist attacking. If you've ever wondered why decades of foreign aid, millions of refugees saved, and billions in benefits paid have never resulted in the slightest gratitude, wonder no more. Far from being grateful for our assistance, they despise us for it. You can't make the holders of a supremacist ideology like you, much less respect you. So as long as we display our tolerance, as a baboon displays its backside, the more we will be screwed. That goes double when the next economic collapse forces European governments to cut their benefits or as the recipients see them, the jizya, the tax infidels pay in return for a quiet life under their Muslim masters.

The next obvious point is that there is a very definite relationship, as outlined by Raymond Ibrahim, between the percentage Muslims in the population and how they behave. Below half a percent they drone on about tolerance and their rights, over 5% you get the occasional beheading in the street and beyond 10% major areas of your national home become off limits. This latest influx which is only just beginning will bring forward the timetable to Eurabia significantly.  

Then as regards the strange delusion of liberals that supremacist Muslims are in fact helpless victims, there are very strong indications that when reality finally dawns about the true nature of Islam our leftie leaders will seamlessly adapt from Islam’s chief benefactor to Islam’s willing bitch. Not really believing in anything themselves, and despising our culture every bit as much as Muslims do, they are vanishingly unlikely to lift a finger in defence of our freedoms and their cowardliness will ensure that they do their level best to prevent the rest of us defending our way of life too.

This isn’t going to end well.

10 comments:

  1. My longer comment got wiped out, so
    1 - 'elite' are scared - google "je suis hypocrite" for images of security they want for themselves;
    2 - drones can bypass self-defence the 'elite' largely keep for themselves - bodyguards & building-security;
    3 - suddenly their security may not be effective, so they'll turn Europe islamic quicker, as muslim mobs are less of a threat to them than hi-tech islamic assassins might be.

    http://appgdrones.org.uk/drones-and-the-counter-terrorism-bill/
    The CNN & Independent links are worth reading to see how quickly the politicians respond to drone risks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, sure they're afraid of terrorist attack from fanatical individuals, but as regards the rapid and accelerating Muslim population in our countries I don't think they are afraid. They have no doubt whatsoever that in the end after an acceptable level of bloodshed that their liberalism will survive and prosper. While they pay lip-service to multiculturalism this was always about destroying the right by atomising society so that they could more easily make everybody dependent on the state. In fact mass immigration was an important factor in this process of breaking down resistance from conservatives. In reality they are convinced that their ideology of progressive liberalism is the logical and inevitable end of history. As Obama put it in a different context "We are the people we've been waiting for". As I said above though there will come a point when they begin to realise that the game's up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon because I work in the public sector, and doesn't that speak volumes ...
    Good points.

    I have friends who are still leftist. Some things I think leftists don't get are:
    - the reason the immigration/Islamization issue is so toxic in debate is that if the worst scenario comes about it would be irreversible. You can argue back and forth about the debt, public spending, lax law and order, weak defence spending, EU, poor education, but all these policies are in principle changeable, if enough people agree. An Islamic takeover of Europe would not be.
    - an Islamist takeover doesn't require a master plan/conspiracy by either a foreign government, or non-state agency;
    - nor does it require violence by Qaeda/ISIS or anyone else within our borders;
    - all it requires is that we let enough of them in;
    - it may well be the majority of immigrants just want the opportunity to get more money (leaving aside whether earned or from welfare), and are sterling fellows;
    - but often their children don't appreciate the host country and are much more open to radicalization;
    - an Islamic/Shariah takeover would not be reversible. Western civilization would be over, forever. If the leftists finally twigged it was a mistake, it would be too late. The Islamists would grasp the levers of power (armed forces, police, censorship, education, who counts the ballot boxes etc.) just as the communists did in Eastern Europe 1945-48. They would also let in floods more (Muslim) immigrants. And don't forget the ingenious master stroke of Islam - you can convert (to get more wives, not be hassled as a dhimmi), but you cannot unconvert - that's apostasy and earns the death penalty.

    I have read reviews of Houellebecq's Submission. Regardless of the merits of this work, I think it does raise some interesting and deeply disturbing points:
    - an Islamic takeover could be effected through the sheer exhaustion of the political class/elite, just as Hitler came to power because the Weimar political system wasn't working.
    - It might seem not so frightening if it was cleverly packaged by a photogenic, smooth-talking front man (No, of course we don't want to kill homosexuals/expel Jews/end free speech/ban alcohol.)
    - Aspects of it might seem palatable to the elite/super-rich (polygamy, could carry on drinking alcohol in private).
    - Certain things might seem better, _in the short term_. If women were "encouraged" to leave the workforce, more jobs for men. Polygamy might appeal to some. If an Islamist/socialist coalition started spraying money like water again, that would please a lot of leftists. Crime rates might fall if strict punishments applied. A lot of foreign policy headaches solved at a stroke, if we just surrender to Qaeda/Taliban/ISIS/Iran etc. etc.


    Dark times ahead. Generally, policies don't change until some disaster has occurred (Churchill became PM in 1940, USA didn't declare war on Japan until Pearl Harbor). I just hope we get a Churchill in time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Demography is destiny. I also have a few leftie friends. As you say, they just don't get it that Muslims not integrating spells doom for all they hold dear. I understand their reluctance though. To accept reality means ditching multiculturalism and admitting to the terrible mistakes they've made all these years.

      Delete
  4. Enoch Powell on a number of occasions on TV predicted a state of civil war. You can find video clip on youtube. He was just thinking at the time in terms of immigration. I think its more liable to happen in France first as its Muslim population is far bigger. The one thing that might change things is economic collapse resulting it some despotic police state being set up. France would then be held together much as ethnically diverse Iraq. Libya and Syria was my a hardman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with pretty much all of that. Britain is still in a much better state than France and most of continental Europe though. We have a true multiracial society of which Muslims only comprise around 5% (10% births). Other European countries mostly have just two main groups, an ageing native population and soaring Muslim one. As Mark Steyn points out, the latter is far less stable.

      Delete
  5. Very convenient the photos of the poor boy Aylan (and one can have complete sympathy with the family regardless of one's views on the current crisis) come just before the 10th anniversary of 9/11, when the "Charlie Hebdo" killings and the antics of ISIS/ISIL were finally making a few pennies drop among the non-political general publc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't just convenient, it was contrived. There are dozens of appalling pictures of Christian children butchered in Syria and Iraq. These are simply not published in the MSM because they reflect badly on Muslims and don't fit the narrative.

      Delete
  6. It seems quite probable that at least one of the EU states will effectively fall to Islam, before the rest really get it. I hope it isn't the UK.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's not probable, it's absolutely certain. The first to go will likely be France, Germany and Sweden. Although none of these countries will have a Muslim majority for at least 40 years, a majority of the young will be Muslim within 20 years or so. But they don't even need that to be in control. The jobless Muslim youth from large families already control the streets while native only children work hard on their studies and careers. This is, of course, a simplification but the reality is there to see on the streets.

    ReplyDelete